, head of ’s primarily who has served as Parliamentary Speaker since 1992, has finally confirmed what many Lebanese have long suspected. Rather than a senior official representing all religious sects and a respected mediator between ’s radical proxy and the /, he has indelibly stamped ’s flag on his forehead.
His speech delivered before a crowd of thousands on Wednesday 31 August marking the disappearance of one of ’s founders Imam and his companions in 38 years ago, included the obligatory muscle-flexing against and was so one-sided it could almost have been penned by ’s Secretary General .
While blaming ’s late leader Muammar for “the worst type of abduction...” Berri expressed the belief that Sadr, born in the Iranian city of in 1928, is still alive. If he believes that his mental faculties are called into question; more likely he was creating a crowd-pleasing scenario to give the mesmerised hope that someday their founder will pop up sporting a beard down to his knees.
A host of conspiracy theories whirl around the cleric’s disappearance, each more farfetched than the other. In 2008, indicted but denied the accusations asserting Sadr and his delegation left the country on a plane to while suggesting he may have been the victim of a power struggle. That sounds more plausible than the idea that 88-year-old Sadr is in hiding or imprisoned or that had him killed over theological differences of opinion.
was quirky but he was no , ’s Supreme Leader, who thinks nothing of executing officials for the crime of slouching in their chair. The Libyan leader had no motive. should research closer to home to find out who benefited from their former chief’s vanishing?
Of far more concern to me is Berri’s endorsement of ’s call for a new political system based on proportional representation spelling an end to the mandating seats in Parliament divided equally between Christians and Muslims while increasing the powers of the prime minister over those of the president.
is politically stagnated and is still without a president due to ’s insistence on the former head of the spearhead, the that signed a memorandum of understanding with .
I have long argued that should dump its antiquated confessional system bequeathed by the French occupiers and in most countries on the planet – especially those without sectarian issues – proportional representation giving political parties seats in parliament in proportion to the popular vote, is workable. But the very real danger for Lebanese Sunnis, Christians and is overall the entire country and its political allies could potentially collect more than half the votes correspondingly garnering over 50 per cent of parliamentary seats.
“Proportional representation is the cure for our national diseases and it is the vehicle by which we can be transported to citizenship rather than isolation and bigotry,” he said. What he means is that handing control to , and their allies would silence opposing voices.
His eagerness for proportional representation contradicts his 2014 commitment. “Power-sharing between Christians and Muslims in would not change under any circumstance,” he assured the Lebanese then, claiming to speak on behalf of Shiites, Sunnis and .
Another troubling aspect of Berri’s impassioned speech was his implied threat to destabilise his fragile country if things do not go his way.
“Let us stop political absurdity...In the face of forces that are continuing their coup against the political life,” he said, adding, “We will resort to the power of the people, if needed.” The forces” he refers to are the political parties that object to an Aoun presidency and the question remains what he means by “the power of the people” as opposed to people’s decision which could be interpreted as a referendum.
The phrase is not transparent. Is he talking about legitimate street protests or twisting arms using armed militias? If the latter, he is raising the spectre of civil war, the last thing needs when such divisions in surrounding countries have amounted to an open invitation for the “Islamic State” and other terrorist fanatics to step-in.
Berri’s threats to will not leave its Prime Minister shivering in his shoes but the topic needed to be brought up as an entree for his recommitment to what he calls his country’s ‘Diamond formula’ – the adherence to a state comprised of army-people-resistance [/ militia].
“Disarming the resistance before eliminating ’s threat is a heresy,” he said which basically means never. is not going anywhere soon and as long as remains under the control of an Iranian-backed armed entity, peace is unlikely to occur during anyone’s lifetime.
and have become one. Berri and Nasrallah share the throne on behalf of Tehran. In July, Berri urged and other Arab states to “rectify” their relations with which he termed an economic necessity. He also blasted the Kingdom for suspending aid to the infiltrated army and internal security services and for imposing sanctions on companies and individuals with links to .
Riyadh has behaved appropriately. In April, the controversial Iraqi cleric who heads two militias was in meeting with Nasrallah.
Now, according to the Lebanese National News Agency, flew to on Wednesday, a visit that coincides with that of a high-level delegation which, a few days ago, has been in Baghdad lobbying Iraqi Prime Minister , who has recognised them as “representatives of ”.
The visitors were also filmed in with the leader of the Imam Al Brigades laughing as he threatened to grind Saudis into dust. An unconfirmed report asserts Al Sadr and the delegation accompanied by members of ’s Hashd Al Sha’abi militias are meeting with Nasrallah in South . It is evident that is officially an Iranian hub for criminals who have launched a war against Sunnis.
When Iranian government officials have been heaping insults upon Saudi and boast of ’s domination of Arab capitals, including , there will be no -Iranian detente unless and until the ayatollahs begin behaving like good neighbours rather than aggressors.
Earlier this year, Mr Berri was elected by colleagues in the Arab Parliament – founded within the to give voice to ordinary Arab citizens – to serve a three-year term as the Parliament’s President. He does not deserve to hold that post since his allegiances lie not with Arabs but with Iranians.
In June, commentator Emile Khouri wrote: “ is continuing with its plan to cause a complete political vacuum in ” to paralyse the state so that it is ripe for ’s takeover; he may well be right on that score and it appears Berri is oiling the way.
Now that Berri has wrapped himself in the /Iranian flag I believe it is time for the to designate this individual as ‘persona non grata’. He should be barred from visiting member states and from meetings held between Lebanese and Gulf representatives at all levels.
I feel deeply sorry for the Lebanese people and worry for the fate of their homeland, a country that grabbed my heart during my first ever visit in the early 1970s. Until its people find a way to wrest it from ’s clutches, the dark clouds preventing its blossoming politically, economically, diplomatically and socially will continue to obscure its tomorrows. For me, who once spent wonderful summers in , believed in its people, celebrated their successes and did not hesitate to invest in their future, this is one of the saddest realities of my life!