European countries not only have a strange and disturbing stance on ‘freedom’, they consistently apply double standards with regards to bigotry. Whereas many have strict laws against anti-Semitism and blasphemy, Islamophobes are often permitted free rein to insult , disrespect the Prophet and foment anti- hatreds under the banners of free speech or freedom of expression.
Allowing citizens to exercise their freedoms is one thing, but standing back when their expression is maliciously directed at others should not be tolerated in any decent society. Such ‘anything goes’ attitudes have resulted in extreme right wing parties, racist parties, being given platforms to spout their hate-filled propaganda that is lapped-up by the weak-minded.
And those parties, as well as Neo-Nazi groups, are gaining ground in the United States and all over , particularly in France, Belgium, Italy, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland and , where the up-and-coming Party of Freedom is headed by the most vicious hate-monger since Adolph Hitler, Geert Wilders.
Wilders has advocated banning the Quran, instituting what he terms “a rag head” tax and some years ago, he released a short film anti-Islamic film titled “Fitna”. Wilders was tried and acquitted for inciting hatred against Muslims. The judge actually ruled that the defendant’s statements were “acceptable within the context of public debate” and although they were “gross and denigrating” they had not fuelled hatred.
Last December, a public prosecutor in The Hague announced that the populist Dutch politician would be prosecuted for inciting racial hatred against the country’s Moroccan community that he has referred to as “scum”. But no trial date was fixed and it seems charges have been dropped. In May, Wilders was the keynote speaker at a contest for drawings of the Prophet in Garland, Texas - billed as “a free speech contest” - that was interrupted by gunmen. And now because the Dutch parliament refused to exhibit those cartoons, he plans to display them on TV. The consequences of beaming those sacrilegious scrawls around the world could have devastating consequences.
Personally, I think those countries mentioned above are digging their own graves, both socially and politically. The right-wing capitalises on people’s fear of the other, which expands during an economic downturn. If the day comes when Wilders’ party, or others of the same ilk, succeeds in winning elections, communities will be split, minorities discriminated against and there will be violence in the streets. There is a very fine line between freedom and anarchy. But if those in charge of European states edging towards fascism are unable to see the writing on the wall, without wishing to sound uncaring, that is not really my problem.
My concern rests with the unwillingness of predominantly countries, particularly in the World, to send a clear message to countries that give a platform to those who make a living out of attacking my beloved faith, , that doing so is unacceptable.
As for the imbeciles, whose mission in life is to draw offensive cartoons of the Prophet, knowing full well that depictions of the Prophet Mohamed is strictly forbidden in , they are mere midgets beneath my contempt. is not hurt by their actions, the world’s fastest growing religion with 1.6 billion adherents; they are just sick nobodies in my book.
What is disgraceful is the blessing they receive from governments that claim any restriction on their activities would breach their personal freedoms. As Arabs and Muslims we cannot accept such an excuse because disrespecting our religion, which we have a duty and a religious obligation to defend, is a red line that cannot be crossed. Freedom is not unlimited and especially when one man’s freedom can provoke another’s pain and anguish. That is the dog-eat-dog law of the jungle.
The US is just as guilty of failing to pass laws forbidding public spectacles of bigotry designed to incite hatred, such as a Texan pastor’s ‘Burn a Quran Day’, the cartoon contest in Garland and anti-Islamic advertisements plastered on New York City buses. Why? Because bigots and racists are protected by the Constitution’s First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of expression. Even the anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, racist Ku Klux Klan, with a long history of bombing and burning enjoys First Amendment rights to rally, march and field candidates for political office.
We Muslims, on the other hand, would never ridicule other religions – and here I am talking about the faithful, which should not be confused with terrorists who distort ’s message and use it to justify their crimes. One of ’s strengths is its tolerance of other faiths and its belief in God’s messengers - (Moussa), (ISA) and the , who gave us God’s word guiding every aspect of our lives. not only reveres , and Mohammed but all God’s messengers and, moreover, respects the Peoples of the Book – Christians and Jews. And all we ask is for to be respected in turn. If that respect is not given willingly by our western allies, then the World must demand it or else.
In 2012, the (OIC) responded to the “Innocence of Muslims”, a US-made video defaming the Prophet that ignited heated protests in various countries and heightened anti-American sentiments.
“Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent need on the part of states to introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions and incitement to religious hatred as well as denigration of venerated personalities,” said Pakistan’s ambassador to the UN on the OIC’s behalf. His US counterpart replied saying, “Religious dignity is best protected when there is free speech…”
I would appeal to the OIC, the and the to petition those countries that are havens for smirking bigots, racists and haters and make it clear to them that there will be a price to pay if public defamation of the Prophet continues unimpeded and goes unpunished.
Governments of all Islamic countries, including those within the world, must stand strong and unified on this point; they must insist that the West passes appropriate laws so that this disturbing and dangerous trend, which is not only injurious to sensitivities but also a gift to radical recruiters, is brought to an end.
The vilification of is not something that any leader can cover his eyes or his ears to avoid for the sake of good relations. We would not accept a friend who insulted our mother, so why should we tolerate allies who give a green light to their citizens to insult our Prophet and our Holy Book, which is far worse?